Perdido Street Station (2000) by China Miéville

perdidostreetstation1There is no doubt that China Miéville’s Perdido Street Station is an acquired taste for the uninitiated, and even for the initiated—those of us who were raised on the strange and squishy, green-tinted worlds of Roald Dahl animated features, and the obstructive prose of Lovecraft and his buddies. At times, it’s bumbling and immature, while also being rich and immense. But it almost always overwhelms as an ambitious sensory experience that not all readers will be prepared for.

Isaac Dan derGrimnebulin, a brilliant yet erratic theoretical physicist, is approached by a wingless garuda who seeks his help to regain flight, providing ample opportunity for Isaac to tinker with his passion for chaos theory. Isaac’s lover, the avant-garde artist Lin, a self-imposed exile of the Kepri community, whose insectile anatomy forces her relationship with Isaac into the unacknowledged shadows, is vetted by the mobster kingpin Mr. Motley to produce a life-size statue of his monstrously modified physique. Both lovers are offered a level of challenge and compensation that they cannot resist, which lures them deeper into the dark and dangerous underworld of New Crobuzon.

[WARNING: Semi-braggy personal disclosure in the next two paragraphs. Detour if you want. feel like sharing today.]

I first attempted to read this novel years ago, in the midst of a fiction dry spell, my perpetually uninformed and disappointing hunt for quality and satisfying genre fiction. I was busy, my head chock full of social justice headlines and public policy, and inundated with peer-reviewed social science and historical research. The unreliable hordes of Amazon reviews were my only reference guide for fiction, and somewhere in that clusterfuck I gleaned that Miéville might be an author of like mind. Like many of us who enjoy reading and analyzing speculative fiction, I was overeducated, world-weary, and I desperately craved a foray into the fantastic. One of my inept trips to the library resulted in a stack of fiction books half my height, hardly any of which I can remember. Except for two: Perdido Street Station and a compendium of Lovecraft short stories.

Then I got the busies, and then summer suddenly happened, which left a half-read Miéville neglected on my bedside table. The return date was looming, a beach apartment in the south of Spain was waiting, and I had a luggage limit to adhere to. This was before my conversion to the digital reading experience, so I was forced to commit the crime of weight limit book triage, the hefty Perdido was returned to the library and, another strange recollection, the Lovecraft bit made the cut. (How to de-horrorfy Lovecraft: read him on a sunny beach beneath a rainbow-striped umbrella.) Perdido was a no go because I found it clunky (both in size and scope), detached, and too bizarre.

 

Clunky, detached, and too bizarre… yes. And no.

 

Language lovers will both love and despise this novel with equal enthusiasm. We get lovelies like these rhythmic and florid little snatches:

  • “and then his mind slipped like a faltering flywheel, and he knew nothing except a slew of dreams. A froth of memories and impressions and regrets effervesced up from within him” (p. 474).
  • “a burning jet of intense, sweet thought-calories…” (p. 646).
  • “metadimensional globules of brainpattern” (p. 648).
  • “They had freed the city. It was untenable that they should not walk under the sun” (p. 684).
  • “I open it once more (ignoring Derkhan’s pathetic little words, like some dusting of sugar on poison). The extraordinary tension in the words seems to make them crawl” (p. 704).
  • “RICH BREWS SIT UNEASY ON THE PALATE…” (p. 643). (That’s a metaquote if I ever saw one. Can I get this on a t-shirt? With a giant spider playing tic-tac-toe on the back?)
  • And my favorite: “as alert as poached eggs” (p. 337). (I’m not kidding when I say I love this.)

But, we also get trippy, multisyllabic adverbs. Trippy in the sense that the eyes will unceasingly trip over these complicatedly, perilously placed hazards. A few, fastidiously selected examples:

  • “They walked variously” (p. 354).
  • “It shimmered unreally” (p. 361).
  • “Obstreperously, the metal began to flex” (p. 495).
  • “They twitched their wings infinitesimally” (p. 498).
  • “They bickered lecherously to be female” (p. 499). (An interesting scene, no lie.)
  • “…the air darkened inexorably…” (p. 523).

And, of course, what kind of reviewer would I be without a promised final gross out tally? (This reformed atavist thanks you, digital spyglass icon):

  • 36 references to saliva, spittle, gob, & drool (excludes references to Khepri-spit and the expletive “Godspit!”).
  • 27-ish references to discharge, ichor, exudations, & exude. (it’s sometimes hard to tell if he’s being gross or banal with exude.)
  • 26 references to excrement, ordure, scatology (yup), shat, & shit (excludes use as an expletive, insult, or references to the drug “dreamshit”).
  • 17 references to snot, mucus, & mucal (yes, mucal).
  • 14 references to piss & piss-coloured (urine is conspicuously absent).
  • 9 references to effluvia, effluent, & effluence.
  • 8 references to vomit.

Best (worst) uses of effluvial lingo:

  • “his own shame engulfing him like a mucal sea…” (p. 347). (That’s the grossest simile I’ve ever read.)
  • “they flew they shat, exuding all the sewage from their previous meals” (p. 350).
  • “noisome excremental stew…” (p. 416).
  • “The psychic plane was thick with the glutinous effluvia of incomprehensible minds” (p. 464). (Must admit, I like this one. You had to be there.)
  • “It would vomit forth bullets” (p. 492). (Okay, now you’re just being ridiculous.)
  • “exude a cloud of empathic musk” (p. 499).
  • “dropping heavy to the floor like a white turd” (p. 679). (Guffaw. Because I’m twelve.)

But the names. Oh my god, the names. Dan derGrimnebulin. Lucky Gazid. Cornfed. Teafortwo. Teafor-effing-two. I want a pet, just so I can name it Teafortwo. Miéville wins the contest for best character names ever.

I’ve nitpicked too much, but only because it’s funny I suspect the flamboyant prose, dense adverbs, and sordid language are to blame for deterring readers from enjoying this novel and this author. This is early, unnurtured Miéville. Words are his toys and he plays with them lasciviously. (10 occurrences of the word “lascivious” and its variants, btw.) We know from The City & the City (2009) that Miéville can be restrained (whether this is due to skills development or style mimicry I am not sure yet). Yet, in Perdido Street Station, Miéville is like a German shepherd puppy bounding after language with overlarge paws. The enthusiasm is endearing, even if it is sometimes clumsy and pee-stained.

The imaginative scope of this novel is where we should praise and envy, and the monsters are the best part. Colossal nightmares of Lovecraftian dimension, we meet: surgically-altered Remade beings with creaturific appendages; muscular cactus bipeds; a giant, glossy 4-D spider that behaves as a fearsomely esoteric Jiminy Cricket; mindlessly powerful slake-moths who feed on the subconscious ether of sapient beings; and a self-aware junkyard construct called the god machine, which spies through a sentient Roomba.

And the world-building. Yes, the world-building. It’s there, never burdening the narrative, because there are so many other burdens going on. Just the squishy scum gutters and sharp-edged green-tinted oxidation that this BFG fan desires, and this grown career woman should sniff at. I’m experiencing dissonance here! Don’t look! (<– I stole this from, Matt. Thanks, BBB!)

perdidostreetstation2But I think that’s where we wind up. A fantasy novel with cartoony adult characters in a setting presented with childlike awe. Miéville confuses our sensibilities with his snot-colored gutter world and charms us with his awe-ful imagination. Its ugliness is gorgeous. Its jaggedness, gratifying. Its grotesque, visceral imagery seems adult, yet it tugs at the child within. For that reason, this novel cries out for animation. It needs pictures between the pages. It needs squiggly, scrawly motion picture treatment in green and sepia tint.

I can see why this novel divides genre readers so. Ten years ago, I abandoned the book. Today, I’m pleased that I finished it, and I’m satisfied despite its flaws. RICH BREWS SIT UNEASY ON THE PALATE, the Weaver warns. Well, this brew is certainly rich, and no, it won’t go down easy.

But you should still have a taste.

Recent reviews:
Inverted World (1974) by Christopher Priest
Jewels of Aptor (1962) by Samuel R. Delany
The Southern Reach trilogy (2014) by Jeff VanderMeer

Book Review Index

Upcoming reviews:
Something Wicked This Way Comes (1962) by Ray Bradbury (special Halloween edition!)
Dark Universe (1961) by Daniel Galouye
City of Stairs (2014) by Robert Jackson Bennett
The Shadow of the Torturer (1980) by Gene Wolfe
The Peripheral (2014) by William Gibson

About from couch to moon

Advertisements

33 thoughts on “Perdido Street Station (2000) by China Miéville

  1. It was the word “chitinous” that really got me, about the 8 millionth time.

    I don’t know, man, I have such mixed feelings about this book. The scope and wildness and sensory madness of it–HELL YES. The plodding, indulgent pacing? The ultimately unrewarding ending? The sheer enjoyment of the gross? Um, no.

    I’d just read The City and the City, though, which is so comparatively clean and streamlined, so I might have been biased.

    Like

  2. romeorites says:

    I have yet to read any Mieville but Embassytown is on my TBR pile.

    Like

  3. stephswint says:

    I’m so glad you enjoyed this. I almost abandoned it after three chapters and I am so glad I didn’t. It’s not my favorite book but it made me appreciate Mieville and led me to read Kraken. I love Kraken. I have The City and The City up next. Great review!

    Like

    • fromcouchtomoon says:

      Kraken is also on my TBR list. And I look forward to your review of The City and the City, which I hope you enjoy. It has a delightfully unique premise!

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Tammy says:

    I read this years ago, I think way before book blogging created so many rules about what good writing should be. So I completely fell in love with the writing, because I didn’t know the words “purple prose” at the time. I suppose if I reread it today, I might have a very different reaction. But hopefully not! I loved The Scar even more, although I tried to read the third book in the series, Iron Council, and was bored to tears.

    Like

    • fromcouchtomoon says:

      I was annoyed by the adverbs, but the story is suited for the “purple prose” and grotesque language. There are many shades of purple prose, and I’ll take this over, say, Lovecraft, any day. I wish I could go back in time and tell myself that. 🙂

      Like

  5. I’ve read a lot of Mieville—finished The Scar and Kraken right before I started book blogging, and talked myself out of reviewing them for some reason—but I never got around to reading this one. I was gifted a copy this summer, so the possibility of reading it is distinct…

    Excellent review, and spot-on analysis. If you continue reading through his bibliography you can see Mieville’s bounding enthusiasm for language evolve… it can be clumsy, but it’s unique, you’ll never mistake that prose as anyone but Mieville. The vivid imagination and lush, off-kilter prose can make his books an acquired taste, but really, there are worse tastes to acquire.

    Like

  6. 2theD says:

    You woo me with your content analysis… here, I thought I was the only one!

    Liked by 1 person

  7. This was really interesting to read. I had no idea people were conflicted about this one. I was instantly head over fucking heels in love with it, so much so that I didn’t even really notice some of the kind of language use you point out. Interesting. Makes me wonder how I’ll feel about it on a second read then.

    Like

    • fromcouchtomoon says:

      There has been some controversy that Mieville is overrated and undeserving of his many recognitions, and I think this book sort of fuels that thinking. It doesn’t help that he’s white and male. (But I notice it’s mostly white males making this complaint.)

      Like

  8. nicollzg says:

    I think you could make me want to read pretty much anything.

    Like

  9. […] might like: Fahrenheit 451 (1953) by Ray Bradbury Perdido Street Station (2000) by China Mieville Inverted World (1974) by Christopher Priest Southern Reach trilogy (2014) […]

    Like

  10. […] like to count things, and the ultimate snot-and-poo count anchored my review of China Miéville’s Perdido Street Station (2000). And then I did a quoterific non-review of Ray Bradbury’s 1962 Something Wicked This Way […]

    Like

  11. A certain subset of my friends and I keep an eye out for the word “palimpsest” in the things we read. To be clear, it means “a very old document on which the original writing has been erased and replaced with new writing”, but it is often employed by novelists and cleverclogses to suggest the overlaying of sensory experiences, footprints in the snow, etc.

    Perdido Street Station is the only book I have ever encountered to use this rather rich word, not merely once, but four times. In fact, it might be more, because when I went back through it looking for them I was left with the strangest feeling that there was one instance I couldn’t find any more.

    I liked PSS, but I did feel that Miéville’s fondness for ten dollar words started to wear on my nerves when he kept spending the same ten dollars over and over again…

    Like

  12. […] Perdido Street Station (2000) by China Miéville […]

    Like

  13. […] grotesqueness, the cartoonishness, are muted, still present for that signature Miévillian flavor we like to make fun of, but less of a distraction from the narrative. Where PSS is indulgent and baroque, The Scar is […]

    Like

  14. […] in me that knee-jerk “who the hell is this person?” response I had with my first attempt at Perdido Street Station, with its snot-laden, bug-popping aesthetics on top of a back-cover vanity shot. This is the […]

    Like

  15. […] final Bas-Lag novel, Iron Council (2004). Not as exciting as The Scar (2002), nor as lascivious as Perdido Street Station (2001), Iron Council is a steady political quest, less popular than its predecessors, and not as […]

    Like

  16. […] of SF’s little brother, but I enjoyed the chug-chug meditative nature of Iron Council, and I wish it had been my first Miéville. It kept me soothed during a grim trip to Atlanta and the bumpiest return flight I’ve ever […]

    Like

  17. […] Jabber! From Perdido Street Station by China Mieville (ex. For Jabber’s sake, that wyrman exudes a miasma as pungent as […]

    Like

  18. […] It’s not that powerful, though. It’s contrived around a neat idea about surrealist paintings coming to life after the detonation of a Nazi-era ‘S-bomb,’ while resistance fighters and fascists race to use the monsters against one another. It’s a cute idea, achieves the metaphor and all that, but the story itself was just a bunch of running around and figuring things out, while, unexpectedly, vocalizing through quite a bit of clichéd movie dialogue, which is not something I’ve noticed from Miéville before. (Though I may have been previously distracted by all those other… tendencies.) […]

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s