2013 Hugo Best Novel Announced! Redshirts wins? I have an opinion about that.

Image

I stayed up late last night to learn the results of the 2013 Hugo Awards that were announced in San Antonio at LoneStarCon. I opted to follow along on Twitter while watching the series finale of Star Trek: The Next Generation.

And how fitting, considering Redshirts won. If you’ve read my previous post about each of the 2013 nominees, you would understand why I am both shocked and confused. Although I thoroughly enjoyed Redshirts, it was a little too flippant and silly to deserve such a career-making prize. The story was, at best, a fun, fanboy parody of a space opera, with the novelty of a meta-twist at the end. That, and John Scalzi’s growing fandom was enough to expect a nomination, but I really did not expect it to win the award. The story was so tongue-in-cheek, I’m surprised Scalzi isn’t walking around with a hole in the side of his face.

Then, the other shocker. Lois McMaster Bujold’s Captain Vorpatril’s Alliance won 2nd place. WTF? Apparently, a weak plot with two-dimensional characters and poor writing does not matter if you add it your previously long-standing and highly acclaimed series.

So, what have I learned this year? Never underestimate the loyalty of the fans.

Furthermore, my expected winner (2013) and hopeful winner (Throne of the Crescent Moon) landed 3rd and 4th spots, while Blackout, a book I was surprised to enjoy, got last place.

I suck at awards predictions. This is like junior-high me and the MTV music video awards all over again. Only popular people win.

Sigh.

Despite the status and clout that comes with a Hugo win, they are, after all, fan awards. One cannot expect that every year will recognize the most well-written, thought-provoking, and original contributions to the SF/F genre. Admittedly, this was a weak year for nominations. None of the nominees blew me away, and none of them deserved 5 stars. But, with such a weak ballot, I had a slight hope that a newcomer like Saladin Ahmed and his strong, unique characters and non-white fantasy world would get some deserving attention. But, I’m hearing he’s making it a trilogy, so maybe we’ll see him nominated again.

And with that, the 2013 Hugo cycle has come to a close. I’m ready to keep my ear to the ground for next year’s nominees, which will be announced mid-spring, with the awards happening this time next year in London.

 

Red Shirts and Throne of the Crescent Moon

redshirtsThronecrescentmoon

I’ve returned from my conference with two finished Hugo nominees and a nice head cold. Both books were immensely enjoyable, but I think The Throne of the Crescent Moon took the award for the best of the two. I listened to it as an audio book on my drive to and from my conference, and I must say it was an enjoyable way to spend the time.

Throne of the Crescent Moon, by Saladin Ahmed (audiobook version)

Synopsis
Doctor Adoulla Makhslood wants to retire from his career as a legendary ghul hunter, but must face one more epic struggle against his most frightening nemesis yet. He is aided by his pious assistant Raseed, and a shape-shifting Bedouin girl, Zamia, along with his longtime magical friends, Dawoud and Litaz.

What I loved:
1.  Unlike many fantasy-style stories, the characters are strong and believable. Even the romances between characters are complex and well-paced. I walked away from the book caring about everyone, and hoping there would be a sequel that would bring all the lead characters together again.

2. The details, the mood, the culture… every corner of this world has a piece of beauty in it. Mr. Ahmed builds a gorgeous fantasy world based on the Muslim culture, and pays heed to the nuances that exist in such a world. As a tea lover, the opening pages drew me in as the main character ruminated over his deep love of cardamom tea. I understand.

3. I love that each character has their own unique worldview, which often conflicts with other views in the group. Too often, fantasy characters tend to divide between good and evil, and it’s easy to discern the good guys from bad guys. One of the themes of this story is that good people can come in all packages– which is a hard lesson for some of his characters to learn.

What I… not necessarily disliked, but was uncomfortable with???
1. Basing a fantasy novel on the Muslim culture invites lots of “praise be to God” comments and such. As a skeptic, I prefer novels that are scientific-leaning, godless, or archaically mythological, or novels that include a religious system, but which is often portrayed as the antagonistic part of the story. It’s unusual to find fiction of that is based upon a popular, modern religion.

It was easy to forget my discomfort with all the “praising” and get swept up in the storyline, but there were times when I had to consciously set aside my biases. (As I listened to the final 20 minutes this morning, I wondered if my husband would walk in the room and ask me if I was getting ready for church.) Despite my discomfort, the Islamic element adds dimension to the story, and it would not have been as good without it. (And, yes, I realize that if the story was based on the other popular, modern, monotheistic religion, it would have been more difficult for me to set aside my biases.)

2. Another slight negative, is that the bad guy seems a bit cartoony. While the narration on the audiobook is amazing– (do they have Oscars for audio book narrators?  Because Phil Gigante deserves one. Wow.)– I can’t tell if it is the narration or the writing that makes the antagonist seem so campy. Yes, the bad guy is a seriously scary bad guy, but every time he came around, I pictured a children’s cartoon in my mind. But I’m not sure how Mr. Ahmed could improve upon this portrayal. How can a soul-eating man-jackal be portrayed realistically, really?

Bottom line, I loved this book. The gorgeous Arabian setting provided a fresh take to a tired genre, and I wanted to befriend all the characters.

Redshirts by John Scalzi

This is a blindingly fast read that changes focus just as quickly, and pays homage to our favorite sci-fi genre TV shows. It’s a poor man’s version of Star Trek, but then again, it’s not really about that at all. Oops, I’ve said too much!

Synopsis
Young Ensign Andrew Dahl has just been assigned to the Intrepid, but things are not as they appear. When he starts to question the mysterious accidents that happen to his fellow Ensigns, and the strange behavior of the higher officers, things get dangerous.

What I liked:
1.  The opening chapter is hilarious. Written from a pathetic ensign’s point-of-view (picture Wesley Crusher), we get to hear his thoughts during a typically ill-fated away team mission.

2. The final chapter is a romance, and light-years away from the first “coda.” And I’m pretty sure it’s about Worf. Who doesn’t love Worf?

3. I’m pretty sure every element of the sci-fi genre makes an appearance here. You want time travel? You got it. You want parallel universes with doppelgängers? Sure. Body-swapping? Why not. I love that Scalzi manages to turn his story into the very thing he parodies. So meta.

What I didn’t like:
1. It reads like a throw-away novel. It goes fast, and the dialogue was smirking at me the entire time. The characters aren’t developed at all, although that is the point of the story. Still, the book reads like a screenplay, and maybe that’s what it should have been. I would watch it.

2. It’s crass. The characters are crude, which is probably realistic for any person who signs their life away to work on a space ship away from home. I’m just as crass in my own life, but I prefer my books to be a little more polite.

3. It’s a silly book. Even as it gets serious and teleological toward the end, it’s hard to shake off the silliness. I’m kind of surprised it was nominated for a Hugo award, other than other writers appreciated the metatastically metaness of it all. I guess it’s kind of like the Extras of the sci-fi world. There’s another reason this would probably be best as a live-action show.

Bottom line: It was a fun read. Time to move on.